📱Why Super Apps Work in Asia (But Struggle in the West)
- Kishore Karthikeyan

- Aug 25
- 3 min read
Updated: Aug 27
Ever wondered why people in Southeast Asia can do literally everything, from ordering fried rice to paying their electricity bill, that too inside a single app like Grab or WeChat or TataNeu, while in the U.S. or Europe, you still need five different apps (and a dozen logins) just to get dinner delivered and paid for?
Turns out, it’s not just laziness or convenience. It’s about how consumer behaviours and preferences evolved.

🧐 What is a Super app?
Think of a super app as your one-stop shop. One app to book a cab, order food, pay your bills, and maybe even take a loan. Instead of juggling ten different apps, you live inside one ecosystem. Over time, these apps created stickiness by tying daily habits such as rides, meals, and payments into a single loop.
Quick note before we dive in: B2B super apps for entrepreneurs like Odoo or Zoho are for businesses, and B2C super apps like Grab or WeChat are for consumers. And here, I am going to just talk about the B2C ones.
Now that I have established context, let's quickly see why super apps work in APAC and not in Western countries.
🏪 Market Structure and Competition
Southeast Asia and China gave super apps the perfect playground. In China, one language and one regulatory system made it easy for an app like WeChat to scale nationwide. Whereas the U.S. was different. Each sector already had giants like Google for search, Amazon for shopping, and Facebook for social. Europe? Even more complicated: a patchwork of countries, laws, and payment systems. Success in one market didn’t guarantee success next door.
Meanwhile, Grab in SEA gobbled up rivals like acquiring Gojek’s businesses in Vietnam and Thailand, to become the go-to app for transport and delivery. Try doing that in the U.S., and antitrust regulators would be on your case instantly. You can read more about it here
🛍️ Consumer Behaviour
This is where it gets interesting.
In Asia, most people bought budget phones with limited storage. Keeping 10 separate apps wasn’t practical. So, one super app that can do everything was a perfect fit.
Whereas Western users never minded juggling multiple apps. Phones came with ample storage, the internet was reliable, and people liked the choice.
Yes, the APAC market has high smartphone adoption, but the median storage purchase is 64GB to 128GB, whereas in Western nations the median is at 256GB.
🚚 Last-Mile Customisation
In the West, consumers demand best-in-class performance. Uber for rides. Spotify for music. DoorDash for food. Each app specializes and optimizes the user experience for that one thing.
A super app, by design, can’t go that deep in every vertical. It’s the jack of all trades, master of none. Good enough for most, but not the best.
🪄 Do We Even Need Super Apps in the Future?
Here’s the kicker. But with AI coming in, especially AI agents, I honestly feel the concept of a super app will be so obsolete.
Right now, you use the app’s UI to pay bills or order food. In the future, you’ll just tell your AI agent, “Hey, pay my electricity bill and order biryani”, and it’ll do the rest, no matter which app or service is in the background.
So maybe, just maybe, the super app won’t survive the AI wave.

Comments